![]() |
| CAD, CAM, CAE, design, technical drawing, drafting, delineation, visualization, manufacturing | ISSN 1442-2255 : 5/18/2008 - 5:18:06 AM |
|
Smart Drawing ConversionGTX Intelligent Paper to CAD SolutionsScanning and vectorisation of drawings has come along way in the last few years. GTX conversion software is preceded by its reputation and even with high expectations, Andrew Johnson was delighted and surprised with what he found.
As little as 3 years ago, vectorising software was very basic and could really only convert simple lines that did not cross other lines. This saved considerable time for specialist tasks such as digitising contour lines on maps and charts. In these special cases, many man-hours could be saved if the right conditions were met. But in most cases, real world drawings were beyond the software and people were better off scanning the drawing into a form that allowed them to draw over the top of on the computer a process known as "heads up digitising" -- virtual tracing in CAD over a simultaneous image display. Recognising objects such as text was simply out of the question. Todays offerings are far more sophisticated and modern software includes:
GTX offers two streams of programs. The GTXImage stream starts with a raster only editing program in its base-level offering, GTXImage Edit. GTXImage CAD, GTXImage CAD Plus and GTXImage /GTXICR Plus contain progressively more powerful raster editing tools and a stripped down version of AutoCAD for vector editing. GTXRaster, the other stream, is offered as an AutoCAD "bolt on". It requires the user to have an existing AutoCAD license for the GTX application to work. Entry level starts with GTXRaster CAD with GTXRaster CAD Plus for the more demanding user. GTXICR Plus is offered as a text recognition option for GTXCAD Plus. The pricing begins at A$2,000 for the raster only GTXImage Edit and progresses to A$10,000 for GTXRaster CAD Plus with GTXICR Plus option. I ran my tests using the top of the line versions of each stream. These versions have all the same functions as the lighter weight versions. Tests were run on a Pentium 200MMX, 64Mb RAM, 3.2 Gb IDE hard disk with a Matrox Millenium I graphics card. Getting
Started One of the great things about GTXImage was the way it left my special setup for PMS-View drawing database software alone and automatically gave me another completely different setup for the raster editing trials. By exiting GTXImage, I could return to my other configuration by clicking on my old shortcut. The GTX programs take up to 20 Mb of hard disk space each. GTX Tutorials You can work through the tutorials in less than an hour covering the three key topics. Raster cleanup Raster editing Raster to Vector Conversion Unfortunately, this is where the instructions on technique stop. There is scope for further education in this field. There must be many users teaching themselves the same basic techniques for clever conversion by their own experience all of whom could save days or weeks if some of these procedures were outlined in more detailed tutorials. The manual provides a well laid out function reference and a quick scan reveals a rich set of tools is provided. GTX Tools The tool set is feature-rich and makes these tasks very "do-able". The benefit of using software to automate conversion is in the time and effort saved over basic redrafting. GTX software can save time and effort in most cases. It is very productive for raster cleanup, editing and "heads up digitising". There are no equivalents within conventional CAD packages. Raster to vector conversion is also handled well, but with the following qualifications. It is no better than redrafting when:
In some cases, when objects are very crowded, cross or touch other objects or the scan is poor, there will be little or no benefit in automating conversion. Having said that, if your drawings contain mainly clean, neat lines and discrete text, this software will save many hours. In real world drawings, there are areas of drawings that will benefit enormously and areas that won't. The upside is, that after you have finished converting the easy bits, you don't have to change environments to redraft the hard bits. GTXs Intelligent Object Picking (IOP) lets you pick objects as if they were CAD entities. Raster snap tools allow you to snap to the ends of a line and then operate on them i.e. move, delete, rotate or scale etc.
For raster to vector conversions, the tools work well provided the right technique is used. For the straightforward, clean drawings you can try selecting the whole raster image and vectorising the image in one hit. This will convert text as lines and thick walls etc. will be replaced by a single thin line. Unfortunately, there was nothing in the basic tutorial exercises on technique for difficult areas. To unravel the congestion in some drawings, you need to convert certain things first so that they don't get in the way of other objects. To illustrate this, here is the technique I used to unravel a congested part of an architectural drawing:
Pats on the
Back All the GTX raster editing commands are based on AutoCADs commands for vector i.e. "gsave" to save the raster file, "gerase" to erase some raster and "gmove" to move some raster. A nice touch. Wish List
The indexes are light on for detail. I found many of the terms used in the books were not to be found in the indexes. Since indexing is an automatic process these days, someone must have given a high priority to saving paper. The conversion of raster to vector is presented using a "black box" approach. Many settings for adjusting gaps to be jumped, the maximum and minimum radius of circles to use, the extension of lines to neighbouring lines etc. are not adjustable. I can understand the desire to hide complicated stuff from the new users, but such settings could be hidden behind an ADVANCED button with a reset of default settings button in the unlikely event of a profound maladjustment of controls. On the bug side, I found it annoying that the software tried to
recognise arrow heads in many places and this feature could not be turned off. This
problem occurred on both the GTXImage and the GTXRaster versions of software. GTX advises
this feature will be addressed soon. Occasionally, a piece of a polyline would break out and move itself typically 5mm to the side of the rest of the line. This bizarre undocumented feature occurred in both of the GTX programs loaded. These bugs were reported by email and response/acknowledgment came from UK customer support. "...these features will be fixed in the next revision..." Who Needs This
Software Incidentally, anybody still drawing by hand should review their drafting style to ensure the best automatic conversion of their drawings at a later date. Small changes to the drawing layout can make big differences in conversion efficiency. Learning a sophisticated program that tackles the complex tasks of raster editing and vectorisation takes time. Any office already using AutoCAD and needing this capability is going to save a lot of training time, using a product already familiar to them. The vector files coming out of the software are not based on a third party approximation to a DWG file they are the genuine article. There are some other very good programs on the market, but they certainly don't look and feel like AutoCAD. If another program had some better features for your particular application, you would have to weigh that up against the retraining time.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 1996-2007 Digital Business Media Pty Ltd | home : editorial archive : contact : legal |